Introduction
Many times while developing our applications we feel the need of pagination, where our User Interface (UI) has to list a number of records and fetching them all at once and listing is not a feasible option because of the following reasons -
- High utilization of the network bandwidth which if on a higher side might even choke up the bandwidth.
- User is not guaranteed to see the latest details in a multi user environment.
- High need of RAM on local machine for caching/processing.
So, the solution which is generally implemented in this situation was to fetch only the relevant records from the backend. Until Denali the following were the options used to counter this situation -
- Before SQL 2005 – ORDER BY clause in combination with TOP
- From SQL 2005 onwards – ROW_NUMBER() function with a WHERE clause
And from Denali, we can use ORDER BY clause in combination with OFFSET and FETCH
Implementation
Let’s see how we can get the same output using all of the 3 ways explained above and try to fetch records from 3 to 4 assuming page size to be 2.
Total Records are as under
1. ORDER BY + TOP
DECLARE @PageNo AS INT
DECLARE @PageSize AS INT
SET @PageNo = 2
SET @PageSize = 2
SELECT
*
FROM (SELECT
TOP (@PageSize) *
FROM (SELECT
TOP (@PageNo * @PageSize) *
FROM
dbo.DemoTable DT
ORDER BY
ID ASC) X
ORDER BY
X.ID DESC) Y
ORDER BY
Y.ID ASC
Output
2. ROW_NUMBER() + WHERE
DECLARE @PageNo AS INT
DECLARE @PageSize AS INT
SET @PageNo = 2
SET @PageSize = 2
;WITH Data AS (
SELECT
*,
ROW_NUMBER()OVER(ORDER BY DT.ID ASC) Rno
FROM
dbo.DemoTable DT
)
SELECT
ID,NAME,CITY
FROM
Data
WHERE
Rno BETWEEN ((@PageNo - 1) * @PageSize) + 1 AND ((@PageNo - 1) * @PageSize) + @PageSize
Output
3. FETCH + OFFSET
DECLARE @PageNo AS INT
DECLARE @PageSize AS INT
SET @PageNo = 2
SET @PageSize = 2
SELECT
*
FROM
dbo.DemoTable DT
ORDER BY
DT.ID
OFFSET ((@PageNo - 1) * @PageSize)) ROWS
FETCH NEXT @PageSize ROWS ONLY
Performance
I did a small test using all the 3 ways and have found the Denali (OFFSET and FETCH) way the best performing one followed by the ROW_NUMBER().
Conclusion
I would prefer using the Denali way just for 2 simple reasons -
- Simplicity of code
- Better performance
Remarks
- The Denali code is based on SQL Server Denali CTP 1 and might change after further releases.
It depends on how you configure the module. This is a good tip as well.
ReplyDelete